Backing up secondary DB in log shipping ...

Hello can someone clear this up for me?
In BOL "Log Shipping Tips and Best Practices" is the following
recommendation:
"Generating Database Backups from the Secondary
Since the log shipped database is only a small increment of time out
of sync with the primary database, it is a good idea to use it to
generate the full database backups. This would keep the primary
production server free of the potential overhead and contention
incurred by a daily (or scheduled) backup. "
In my experience and from searching other threads in this group this
is actually not true - backing up the log shipped database will not
work, it will fail with the error:
"Database is in warm-standby state (set by executing RESTORE WITH
STANDBY) and cannot be backed up until the entire load sequence is
completed."
Am I missing something or is BOL just being misleading?
thanks,
PeterPeter,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311115 contains the correction.
Note: With SQL Server 2005, you it might be possible to create a snapshot
database over the secondary and back that up. (But I have no experience
with trying.)
RLF
<peter.wismer@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1187280994.613717.77730@.l22g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> Hello can someone clear this up for me?
> In BOL "Log Shipping Tips and Best Practices" is the following
> recommendation:
> "Generating Database Backups from the Secondary
> Since the log shipped database is only a small increment of time out
> of sync with the primary database, it is a good idea to use it to
> generate the full database backups. This would keep the primary
> production server free of the potential overhead and contention
> incurred by a daily (or scheduled) backup. "
> In my experience and from searching other threads in this group this
> is actually not true - backing up the log shipped database will not
> work, it will fail with the error:
> "Database is in warm-standby state (set by executing RESTORE WITH
> STANDBY) and cannot be backed up until the entire load sequence is
> completed."
> Am I missing something or is BOL just being misleading?
> thanks,
> Peter
>|||On Aug 16, 1:12 pm, "Russell Fields" <russellfie...@.nomail.com> wrote:
> Peter,
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311115contains the correction.
> Note: With SQL Server 2005, you it might be possible to create a snapshot
> database over the secondary and back that up. (But I have no experience
> with trying.)
> RLF<peter.wis...@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1187280994.613717.77730@.l22g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks very much Russell (I was beginning to mistrust my command of
the english language - thought I might need to find a Canadian
translation of BOL...)
Peter|||I think it was a case of wishes versus reality. - RLF
<peter.wismer@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1187288061.528821.290710@.j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 16, 1:12 pm, "Russell Fields" <russellfie...@.nomail.com> wrote:
> Thanks very much Russell (I was beginning to mistrust my command of
> the english language - thought I might need to find a Canadian
> translation of BOL...)
> Peter
>